A Court of Thorns and Roses ~ Sarah J. Maas (A Court of Thorns and Roses #1)
★☆☆☆ ☆ Me to Sarah J Maas: "Do you lie awake at night to come up with all your witty replies for the following day?" Oh dear, this is awful. The Writing The title of this book is stupid. It's stupid and flashy and unrelated to the actual content of the book. It's solely for the ~ wow ~ factor. The quotable line, " I love you... Thorns and all " is wholly ineffective because "thorns" had not been established as a motif and was only used in that context in that very scene, more than halfway through the book. The word "thorn" was only used a grand total of 9 times in this book. The original Beauty and the Beast story had established rose motifs—you can't borrow good writing, even for a retelling. That's just lazy. The writing itself was inconsistent and poorly done. I pushed and pulled, but the mud was too slick, and held fast. Are you aware of the definition of "slick", Sarah ...